A private, AI-assisted environment for sensitive workplace inquiries. The room structures allegations, evidence, disclosures, timelines and findings so investigators can work from a disciplined record — while credibility, legal judgement and final decisions remain with people.
The AI can check claims against admitted evidence, identify inconsistencies, restate accounts neutrally, protect disclosure boundaries, track timelines and test whether a proposed finding has a documentary basis. It does not decide credibility, determine misconduct, infer motive or choose corrective action.
Sensitive inquiries can involve competing accounts, private medical material, protected witnesses, contested documents, interim measures, retaliation concerns and strict disclosure boundaries. The Workplace Inquiry Mediated Table keeps those elements connected to one record without treating them as though everyone should see everything.
The investigator controls the file and the inquiry flow. The system structures the process without replacing the investigator.
Factual statements can be separated into claims and checked against admitted evidence with source citations.
Private submissions and protected witness material can remain restricted while still informing the record in controlled form.
The system can test whether a proposed finding has an evidentiary basis. The finding itself remains a human decision.
The workflow follows the investigator-led pattern demonstrated in The Mediated Table proof of concept: allegations become structured issues, evidence is controlled, each party receives only the appropriate view, and findings must be grounded in the labelled record.
Define roles, inquiry rules, target timeline, confidentiality and any immediate interim measures.
Each allegation becomes a trackable clause with its own evidence, status, criterion and eventual finding.
Policies, messages, emails, HR records, performance records, witness statements and other documents are admitted, disputed, private or protected.
Claims are checked against the admitted record. Opinions, feelings and requests remain distinguishable from documentary facts.
The other party receives an investigator-approved restatement rather than the opposing party's raw filing, with disclosure controls applied first.
Responses are checked against the record; hostile wording can be nudged; requests inconsistent with interim measures can be flagged before delivery.
The room separates what documents establish from what still requires human judgement, while structured checks quantify what can be counted.
A party may challenge a label. The investigator can review the basis without unnecessarily revealing protected material or a sealed identity.
The authorised panel or investigator records findings and corrective actions. The system can require a documentary or structured basis before a finding is recorded.
The room renders the investigation record and recipient-specific notices, then checks disclosure, exports, timeline and audit-chain integrity.
Rather than assembling the final report from disconnected notes after the fact, the Workplace Inquiry Mediated Table keeps the structure of the inquiry alive throughout: allegation status, evidence, claims, contests, interim measures, findings, actions and recipient-specific notices.
The room provides inquiry structure. Applicable law, policy, evidentiary standard, procedural rights and final legal conclusions must be configured and validated for the organisation and jurisdiction.
Complaints involving inappropriate conduct, interpersonal behaviour, policy breaches or management actions that require a structured factual inquiry.
Matters involving sensitive allegations, protected witnesses, private records, interim measures and subsequent-action timelines.
Cases where training records, system logs, policy requirements or other documentary records can settle part of the factual dispute directly.
Internal or external-investigator workflows requiring consistent evidence handling, controlled disclosure and a defensible written record.
Private medical information or a protected witness statement can remain outside a party's view while the system still records the permitted evidentiary basis and supports investigator review.
A proposed substantiated finding can be tested for documentary or structured support before it is recorded, while the actual assessment of conduct, credibility and policy remains with human decision-makers.
The Workplace Inquiry Mediated Table brings evidence, disclosure, process checks, findings and final records into one governed environment — so people can make consequential workplace decisions from a clearer, more defensible record.
Request a Workplace Inquiry demo →