What the AI does not do
- ×Declare who is right.
- ×Choose the “best” settlement.
- ×Silently reinterpret the evidence rules.
- ×Move a clause to agreed without a valid vote.
Private rooms • evidence-aware • human-decided
Resolve the conflict. Close the deal. Keep the decision human.
The Mediated Table is an invite-only, AI-assisted environment for difficult disputes, inquiries and negotiated decisions. It checks factual claims against agreed evidence, restates positions neutrally, identifies what each issue turns on and preserves the record — while people retain the authority to decide.
Nothing is agreed until the parties vote, clause by clause, under rules fixed at the start.
A product of Muktha AI Forge LLP
✓
Private by designInvite-only rooms for the people who need to be there.
✓
Evidence agreed firstThe parties define what counts as proof before arguing the facts.
✓
Human authorityFindings, agreements and consequential decisions remain with people.
✓
Defensible recordEvidence, checks, decisions and visibility remain attached to the record.
Category-defining by design
A capability set the market does not currently offer in one place.
The Mediated Table brings together capabilities that are typically fragmented across mediation, investigation, case-management and AI tools: governed private rooms, evidence with visibility scopes, claim-level labels with citations, compatibility checks, neutral restatement, crux identification, constraint-aware options, hostility nudges, human decision rules and documents rendered from an auditable record. Other tools address parts of this workflow. The Mediated Table brings the whole process together.
A different role for AI
Most tools store the material.
The Mediated Table structures the process.
Put opposing interests into one AI conversation and it can start behaving like an arbiter. The Mediated Table separates assistance from authority.
What the AI does
- ✓Check claims against the evidence the parties accepted.
- ✓Flag contradictions with already-agreed clauses.
- ✓Restate positions neutrally and identify the crux.
- ✓Offer option packages that respect everyone’s stated constraints.
How it works
One disciplined philosophy. Different ways to apply it.
The private-room products use a common nine-step core: explicit roles, agreed evidence, claim-level checking, controlled disclosure, human decisions and an auditable output. The Social Mediated Table carries the same claim-not-person, evidence-with-citation discipline into an open public feed.
01
Invite-only room
Two or more parties, with a human neutral if they want one.
02
The matter, defined
The convener sets out the conflict or deal and the clauses to settle.
03
Agreed evidence
The parties decide up front what sources count as proof.
04
Labelled claims
Each claim is marked verified, contradicted or not covered, with the relevant passage cited.
05
Incompatibility check
A proposal that conflicts with an agreed clause is flagged before it reaches the room.
06
Restatement, crux, options
Positions are restated neutrally, the crux is named and constraint-respecting options are offered.
07
Hostility nudge
A hostile draft gets a suggested rephrase — never a penalty.
08
Clause-by-clause voting
Only a vote, under rules fixed at the start, moves a clause to agreed.
09
Document from the record
The room renders the instrument the setting needs — a Document of Understanding, inquiry report, notices or another structured outcome.
One core. Different rooms.
Choose the Mediated Table built for the matter.
The private-room products share a governed core, while The Social Mediated Table adapts the same evidence-first, claim-not-person discipline for a public feed. Each product applies the principle to its own setting, roles, evidence model and guardrails.
Here are three examples —
Family • Property • Inheritance
🏠
Multiparty Mediated Table
For family property, inheritance, estate, co-ownership and other multi-party disputes where several people may hold different evidence, constraints and acceptable outcomes.
- Private constraints can shape options without being exposed.
- Claims are separated from evidence, preferences and proposals.
- Linked issues can be worked through clause by clause or as packages.
- The outcome remains an explicit human agreement.
HR • Employee Relations • Investigations
🏢
Workplace Inquiry Mediated Table
For sensitive workplace inquiries where investigators need structured evidence handling, protected disclosures, timeline checks and a defensible record — without automated adjudication.
- Investigator-led workflow with controlled participant views.
- Private submissions and protected witness material stay scoped.
- Findings can be checked for evidentiary support before recording.
- Credibility, findings and corrective action remain human decisions.
Public Social • Claim Validation • Evidence
🌐
The Social Mediated Table
A public, feed-based extension of The Mediated Table's evidence discipline — designed for open social conversation where factual claims can be validated against a public, inspectable evidence corpus.
- Validation is opt-in, per post and per factual claim — never a score on the person.
- Each validated claim carries a category label and a citation to the exact supporting source.
- The evidence corpus and weighting logic are public, versioned and open to structured challenge.
- Validation adds evidence context; it does not remove, hide, down-rank or adjudicate speech.
The architecture is broader than any one use case.
The private-room products share one governed core for evidence, confidentiality and explicit human decision rules. The Social Mediated Table extends the same claim-level evidence discipline into a public, feed-based setting — while preserving the principle that technology supports the process without judging the person.
The output
A record generated from the process — not reconstructed afterwards.
Every clause carries its status, the parties’ positions, the evidence behind relevant claims and the votes that moved it. What is agreed stays distinguishable from what is still open.
Room record
Live record
Issue / clause 1
AGREED
Vote recorded
Evidence-backed claim
EVIDENCE
2 sources cited
Open issue
OPEN
Crux identified
Human decision
AGREED
Constraint check passed
Where it fits
Built for matters where evidence, constraints and process integrity matter.
The three products above show how the same design philosophy can work across private disputes, formal inquiries and public conversation — with the workflow adapted to the setting rather than forcing every problem into the same interface.
🏠
Family & property
Multi-party settlements involving ownership, valuation, timing, reimbursement, private constraints and explicit consent.
🏢
Workplace inquiries
Investigator-led matters involving allegations, protected evidence, disclosure boundaries, findings and notices.
🌐
Public social discourse
Open conversation with opt-in, per-claim validation against a public evidence corpus — without scoring people or turning validation into moderation.
🧩
Future applications
The same evidence-first, human-authority principles can be adapted to other disputes, inquiries and structured decision environments.
Bring difficult matters into one governed process — without giving the technology the decision.
Explore a room above or contact us to discuss early access, a pilot or a room configured for your organisation.